Search for: "D. V. Perry"
Results 1 - 20
of 739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 4:04 pm
Nan D. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:50 am
Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry and others; Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry and others (No 2) [2012] UKSC 35; [2012] WLR (D) 238 “A disclosure order obtained in civil recovery proceedings did not authorise sending information notices to persons who were outside the United Kingdom. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:48 am
Regina v White; Regina v Dennard; Regina v Perry; Regina v Rowbotham [2010] EWCA Crim 978; [2010] WLR (D) 120 “For the purposes of tobacco smuggling cases there was unlikely to be any incompatibility between the rules which made those liable under the Excise Goods (Holding, Movement, Warehousing and REDS) Regulations 1992 or the Tobacco Products Regulations 2001 to pay duty and those made liable by Council Directive 92/12/EEC. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
Harris v Perry and another [2008] EWCA Civ 907; [2008] WLR (D) 278 “It was not reasonably foreseeable that boisterous play on a bouncy castle would involve a significant risk of serious harm and, therefore, parents who hired a bouncy castle for a children's party did not have a duty of care to keep the children playing on it under uninterrupted supervision. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:18 am
Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry [2010] EWCA Civ 907; [2010] WLR (D) 213 “An information notice served on the London address of persons not in the United Kingdom at the time of service was validly served for the purposes of recovery proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
Jason Mazzone asserts that the Ninth Circuit's decision yesterday in Perry v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:10 am
Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry and others (No 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 578; [2011] WLR (D) 164 “A court in England and Wales had the power under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to make a recovery order in favour of the trustee for civil recovery in respect of recoverable property outside the jurisdiction, whether moveable or immoveable. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:03 am
Transcript of 11/02/09 hearing on scope of discovery in Perry v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
By Mike Dorf As promised earlier in the week, I've now watched and listened to the oral argument in Perry v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 12:34 pm
(U.S.S.C., June 23, 2017, Perry v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Perry. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:27 am
In 2001, just months after Perry's ascension to Governor, the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Perry himself called Acting Deputy Attorney General Donoghue on Dec. 27. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
If you are an eminent domain junkie like us, then you will appreciate knowing that the City of Perris v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Perry. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
He'd look courageous, but it would be a sham, since he'd be taking a high road with which nobody could much disagree. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:58 pm
Ellen D. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 10:37 am
Steven D. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
His dissent follows in full: (PERRY, J., dissenting.) [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
Windsor, Vaughn Walker, Vikram Amar, Vikram D. [read post]
